Let's just cut right to it, this show was painfully boring. There, I said it. A story built around partial amnesia has real potential, but between the choppy scene structure and random flashbacks thrown in constantly, the whole plot ends up feeling more tangled than it needed to be. The romance doesn't fare much better either, it's written so poorly that I never really found myself invested in this couple. Both leads come across stiff on screen and deliver their lines in a really awkward way. The show runs 8 episodes, each somewhere around 30 to 35 minutes. Hanuel, a 29 year old language teacher, wakes up after an accident only to realize his memory stops at age 19. It turns out he'd been in another accident back then too, which is why his memories cut off at that point. He has zero recollection of the fact that he's currently living with his childhood friend Saebyeok, who's now a huge celebrity. That makes the whole situation even harder for Hanuel to wrap his ...
We open with the news that a gay man named Jay has been stabbed to death in his own apartment, and we see how his mom and the rest of his family react, along with how the aftermath unfolds. We're also told the killer's been caught, but has he really? About fifteen minutes in, the film rewinds back to the morning of the murder itself. Now we're following a cameraman and a director who wants to make a documentary about this exact killing. He shows up at Jay's family home, before they even know about the murder, and films their raw reaction in real time as they learn their son and brother has been killed. The camera just keeps rolling through all the hysterical crying and screaming that follows. Jay stands off to the side, completely detached, calmly directing his cameraman through it all. This keeps happening as various people get interviewed one after another. When part of the footage ends up destroyed, Jay actually asks the mother to redo the scene, going as far as placing a different body in the morgue just so she'll cry again on camera. The way the journalist manipulates Jay's ex boyfriend into giving an interview is genuinely clever filmmaking. But things really peak when police finally catch the actual killer, and Jay decides the moment just isn't "TV friendly" enough. So he has the cops stage the capture all over again for more drama, which ends up letting the killer escape and leads to a messy chase before he's caught again, perfect footage for television. In an incredibly meta twist by the end, Jay now has to reenact his own murder.
It's easy to get pulled into thinking you're watching a real documentary or doc drama, and it takes a while to register that everyone on screen is actually acting. By breaking down the documentary piece by piece and showing what's really happening behind the camera, the film digs into sensationalist journalism, how it bends, stretches, and reshapes the truth, and asks why, is it for higher ratings, some kind of artistic satisfaction, a false sense of doing good through exposure, or just a twisted thrill from exploiting people. Jay and his cameraman are technically supposed to be narrating this whole thing as a documentary. The actor playing Jay, the gay journalist at the center of it, does a genuinely strong job playing someone cold and calculated, someone who's only there to direct people on how to react and when to grieve so he gets the best possible footage. He never leans into exaggerated gestures or an over the top voice the way a lot of actors might with this kind of role. Instead there's this natural ease to his performance that feels believable and grounded, nothing stereotypical about it. He even flirts a little with Jay's ex boyfriend, a shy, humble, genuinely likable guy. The mother of the victim ends up becoming collateral damage in the reporter's obsession with nailing his big story, which really comes through in that scene where they force her to redo her breakdown at the morgue. The ending might leave you a bit puzzled. Was this whole thing actually orchestrated by the real Jay? While everything in the film is pushed to an extreme, it still manages to sting a little because it forces you to think about how we treat the actual people behind the stories we consume. If you watch this the right way, you'll walk away with a better sense of the ethics, or lack of them, in the media we take in every day.
Bottom line, a sharp, unsettling take on media exploitation with a strong central performance. (6.5/10)
Comments