A Revry original, Unconventional is a really well-liked queer dramedy that feels totally different from the usual stuff. The heart of the story is about two pretty eccentric queer siblings and their partners trying to build a family that doesn't follow the traditional rules. It takes a super raw and unfiltered look at queer life, diving deep into things like mental health, addiction, and how complicated identity and relationships can get. It’s not afraid to get messy or show people at their most vulnerable, and it really pushes boundaries while showing a lot of different queer experiences. The first season has nine episodes, and each one is about a half-hour long. The story centers on Noah, a grad student who’s been struggling for years to wrap up his PhD. He’s been with his husband, Dan, for nine years, and they’ve recently gotten married and moved to Palm Springs. While they're trying to figure out how to start a family and have a baby, they decide to shake things up by in...
There is a scene in this film where the film maker takes his script to show to a producer (?) and he remarks saying, 'I don't understand what this film is about' and that is exactly what I felt having watching the film. I just wasn't sure what the film is about. Online reviews call it a self-reflective fiction that muses on what we find comic about the human condition, and what can reduce us to tears. Made for festival circuits and arthouse cinema, there was absolutely nothing that I liked about this film.
Joseph is a gay man and a film maker who has a 3 year old son Pino with his best friend Sonya. He broke up with his boyfriend more than 3 years ago and is now planing to make a passionate comedy film. Sonya returned prematurely from the clinic dealing with depression and she needs to go back there. His meetings with the producer who keeps asking for what he wants to make next creating another weird scenario especially when producer chews dog treats and gives it to the dog. The stars of Joseph’s last film have a very public fight after the premiere, and Joseph ruins a date with Dominic, the handsome nude model from his art class, after romantic expectations collide with parental responsibilities. He also wants a big head sculpture of his own for his film for some reason. Earlier, when Joseph gets his fingers stuck in a vending machine, his only help is an awkward woman who fusses over what snack to buy. Each scenario, ripe for and attuned to comedy’s absurd and pathetic potential, tests the limits of Joseph’s ability to pretend everything is fine. Towards the end, he meets his ex, who has moved on and wishes Joseph best of luck.
The actor-director has tried to experiment with various facets of comedy. juxtaposes philosophies and absurdism, exploring different layers of laughter, but you know what.. I didn't laugh even for a single second. Half of the time I was rolling my eyes. I really don't understand the kind of humor that uses sarcasm during an intense argument, laughter arising from the depths of a degenerative mental illness, or outward joy masking hidden pain. And when his producer says he doesn't understand his script, I screamed - Finally, someone said what I am feeling. I din't think the film was parody or satire or even comedy and yet I am still chocked reading all these glorious reviews by critics all over from multiple film festivals. I have realized one thing that European films that feature in those big film festivals have a huge disconnect between what critics like and what a generic audience like me prefers. I have seen this play out time and again and I see that still happening. To each his own, but this film should be a hard miss for just ordinary folks like me. (2/10)

Comments