A Revry original, Unconventional is a really well-liked queer dramedy that feels totally different from the usual stuff. The heart of the story is about two pretty eccentric queer siblings and their partners trying to build a family that doesn't follow the traditional rules. It takes a super raw and unfiltered look at queer life, diving deep into things like mental health, addiction, and how complicated identity and relationships can get. It’s not afraid to get messy or show people at their most vulnerable, and it really pushes boundaries while showing a lot of different queer experiences. The first season has nine episodes, and each one is about a half-hour long. The story centers on Noah, a grad student who’s been struggling for years to wrap up his PhD. He’s been with his husband, Dan, for nine years, and they’ve recently gotten married and moved to Palm Springs. While they're trying to figure out how to start a family and have a baby, they decide to shake things up by in...
When I started watching this film, it kept reminding me of the UK mini series that I had seen sometime back called Des, which I had reviewed here. The similarities were quite striking but since the names of characters name was different, I couldn't be sure. And No wi read that indeed this film also was a fictional account of the same serial killer Denis Nielsen (here named Jordan March), who disposed of at least 13 young loners and losers.
February, 1983. Detectives are called to a residential address in the London suburbs following reports that the drains have been clogged by human remains. One of the property’s residents, Jordan March is called in for questioning. Slowly he accounts for how he lured young gay man, mostly homeless and jobless, got them into his apartment and eventually kill them. He would bury them under his floorboards and take them out and sometimes sleep with them or just sit with them till the bodies get too smelly.
The film is shot in a very documentary like style without any high production thrills. In fact the photography is often grainy and dim, but it does capture the sleazier late eighties London night life with a raw beauty. The film looks much older than it really is and I am told that this was done on purpose (I wonder why since personally for me , that doesn't work). One thing that's missing here is any overt reflection on the homophobia prevalent at the time. We encounter it only through its secondary effects: the number of young queer men drifting through life with no-one to look out for them. The interrogating officer goes from plain mad to somber to arrogant, which I presume was the situation of the detectives those days in dealing with a criminal like this man. Also we do see trippy flashbacks to Jordan’s childhood where he witnessed the death of his grandfather, presumably triggering his various morbid fascinations that we never really get any background on. Something seemed to be missing in the film, since it never really went deep into the why's and psyche of the characters. Interestingly, even the victims were not shown as likable characters for some off reason.
I would recommend to give this one a miss and watch Des instead. Brilliant acting with a detailed account of exactly what happened, this experimental film instead leaves a lot to be desired. (3/10)

Comments