This is the second vertical AI BL drama I've sat through, and honestly I went in knowing better. I had it on while I was doing cardio at the gym, and what struck me was just how much the plot echoed the last one I watched. Same step brother romance angle, same mystery girlfriend showing up near the end, same extra guy pining after one of the leads. Genuinely the only thing going for it was the runtime, the whole thing wrapped up in forty five minutes flat. The setup kicks off with Finn moving schools because his mom just married into money. He finds out his new step brother Aiden goes to the same place, and he's warned to keep his distance from him. Their first run in at school is rocky, just like you'd expect, but there's this odd pull between them neither can shake off. Finn keeps telling himself not to read into it because Aiden's straight and openly homophobic. Things shift when some kids start bullying Finn and the student council president, Ryan, steps in to ...
Before 1966, these gay magazines were all about musclemen in jockstraps posing like Greek Gods. But then, everything flipped. In this "golden window" from 1966 to 1973, the pages started featuring young guys between 18 and 22 who had boyish faces and totally normal bodies. They weren't gym rats; they were just ordinary kids, often drifters or runaways, who modeled for unknown photographers for just a few bucks. They’d show up in a magazine for a minute and then just disappear. After 1973, the "hardcore revolution" happened, and these softcore magazines became old news almost overnight. Just like that, the whole era was gone.
The movie mixes together old photos, actual magazine pages, and some re-enactments to try and catch the vibe of that time. The director acts as the narrator and guide, and since he was a big part of queer filmmaking in the 70s, he brings an insider’s perspective that a history book just couldn't capture. He talks about how the old studio photography died out as mass-produced, cheaper work took over. He’s also really open about his own taste for what he calls "wayward kids"—scrawny and scruffy types—before he was eventually moved aside by other photographers, who sold the "California Golden Boy" look with blond hair and big smiles. The film also digs into how this industry lived in a legal gray area back when being gay was still a crime in most of the U.S. These magazines weren't just for titillation; they were proof to gay men that they weren't alone and that they could be beautiful. On the downside, a lot of the footage and photos are fuzzy and low-quality because they've degraded so much, and the narration sometimes leans on clichés instead of really digging deep into the history. I honestly found this whole thing fascinating because I didn't know anything about this subject before. It does a great job of saving these faces, names, and stories that mainstream history has mostly just erased.
It's a really cool look at a lost era of queer media that acts as an important historical record, even if the production quality is a bit rough around the edges. (5.5/10)
Comments